Duration 16:29

Intel (INTC) Crash Q3 2021 Earnings Recap Price Prediction

by Two Stupid Guys Trade Stocks

1 361 watched

0

63

Published 28 Oct 2021

We discuss the recent Intel (INTC) earnings by business segment and use the current management expectations to make a price prediction for INTC stock for 2026! We also touch on INTC valuation when compared to AMD its chief rival. INTC had a massive crash of over 10% following this earnings report, I discuss my strategy for mitigating those losses with covered calls! Vinny Webull referral https://act.webull.com/ve/BuIs4NzMNrFN/eip/inviteUs/ Dylan Robinhood referral Join Robinhood with my link and we'll both get a free stock 🤝 https://join.robinhood.com/dylani1 Disclaimer: The opinions contained in this video are our own. We are not licensed investment professionals if you choose to participate in investments discussed herein you do so at your own peril. No investment is without risk and you may very well lose money. #INTC, #AMD, #ValueTrap TAGS: INTC stock analysis, Intel stock analysis, AMD stock analysis, intc earnings, INTC earnings, AMD earnings, intc, intel, intc stock, intc stock analysis, value investing, value trap, cash flow, free cash flow,investing, financial analysis, INTC, DCF, free cash flow yield, amd, amd stock, AMD, AMD stock analysis, intc stock price, buy intc now, semi stock, semiconductor stocks, semiconductor shortage, semiconductor stocks to buy, discounted free cash flow, earnings, earnings update, quarterly earnings, INTC earnings, AMD earnings, Intel earnings, AMD Earnings, INTC price prediction, intc price prediction

Category

Show more

Comments - 36

@

@bretttingey56233 years ago Intcs 20 year under performance is a function of being over hyped during the tech bubble. I dont understand why that would be dillons reason to avoid id="hidden1" them now. My take away would be to avoid companies priced at sky high multiples. ...Expand 6
@

@rachelsade46113 years ago So, would buy amd now for the long term? 1
@

@edmundsutro3 years ago Value investing ineffective at current low interest rates. 2
@

@goblingoon903 years ago Great video. Bullish on intel' s future. Keep up the good work! 1
@

@jaanliitmae65993 years ago If your 2026 forecasts are not materialized even remotely, board will somehow start to look into spin-off`s and similar stuff (as heavy buy-backs did not . ...Expand 2
@

@theicedragon1003 years ago Why would a chip shortage hurt intel they make the chips so if their products are good they can make more money. 1
@

@warrenking79653 years ago Im long at around $53 cost. Im not buying more but ill pick up more via leveraged q as its 1. 33 percent of that. My original thesis is if geopoli id="hidden3"tical drama increases in asia then american manufacturing is going to be critical so i wanted at least some exposure to criticalmicron and tsmc are also building us foundries if i understand correctly. Historically this stock has seen several 30% crashes from peak to trough and it crashes with the market as well as other times. So overall at least the way the market treats this stock, i can still expect it to crash when the qs crash so i get as much downside risk but less upside? If hit 45 again maybe it would be worth buying because thats basically the floor but maybe better just to get the soxl and be better diversified. I also dont like the buybacks. The market likes confidence. Look at telsa building factories and they dont get punished because manufacturing is low margin. Maybe because manufacturing helps you protect trade secrets?. ...Expand 2
@

@miraclekhulgee14963 years ago Yo guys i went yolo calls intc 52 exp 12/03 with 100 contracts. I bet they will be gap fill 55 area. I am very fascinated by intc. Cause it seems like . ...Expand
@

@gabrielw77733 years ago I let the institutions tell me if intc earning were going to be good or not. They know ahead of time what the earnings will be. There is no way intc takes . ...Expand 1
@

@TheFishingNomad3 years ago That is not Intel's fault. That is solely the fault of stupid people overhyping the stock 20 years ago. 4
@

@altairjb3 years ago A dead company with new products about to come out that seem to be pretty good. Generate profits every year and consistently, unlike some " great id="hidden7" out there. I don' t mind investing in this dead company. I see so many yts tout the virtues of companies without explaining how they derive their prices. Overpaying comes with a cost, and i don' t think many people realize it. When i see praise of msft for example andof buying (although never financial advice) i don' t see them saying that msft would have to grow 30 percent a year for the next years (13 over the last 5 for context) and that for an 8 percent discount rate. Great company, just not a great price. ...Expand 2
@

@bretttingey56233 years ago Intcs 20 year under performance is a function of being over hyped during the tech bubble. I dont understand why that would be dillons reason to avoid id="hidden8" them now. My take away would be to avoid companies priced at sky high multiples. ...Expand 6
@

@jaanliitmae65993 years ago If your 2026 forecasts are not materialized even remotely, board will somehow start to look into spin-off`s and similar stuff (as heavy buy-backs did not . ...Expand 2
@

@warrenking79653 years ago Im long at around $53 cost. Im not buying more but ill pick up more via leveraged q as its 1. 33 percent of that. My original thesis is if geopoli id="hidden10"tical drama increases in asia then american manufacturing is going to be critical so i wanted at least some exposure to criticalmicron and tsmc are also building us foundries if i understand correctly. Historically this stock has seen several 30% crashes from peak to trough and it crashes with the market as well as other times. So overall at least the way the market treats this stock, i can still expect it to crash when the qs crash so i get as much downside risk but less upside? If hit 45 again maybe it would be worth buying because thats basically the floor but maybe better just to get the soxl and be better diversified. I also dont like the buybacks. The market likes confidence. Look at telsa building factories and they dont get punished because manufacturing is low margin. Maybe because manufacturing helps you protect trade secrets?. ...Expand 2
@

@miraclekhulgee14963 years ago Yo guys i went yolo calls intc 52 exp 12/03 with 100 contracts. I bet they will be gap fill 55 area. I am very fascinated by intc. Cause it seems like . ...Expand
@

@gabrielw77733 years ago I let the institutions tell me if intc earning were going to be good or not. They know ahead of time what the earnings will be. There is no way intc takes . ...Expand 1
@

@altairjb3 years ago A dead company with new products about to come out that seem to be pretty good. Generate profits every year and consistently, unlike some " great id="hidden14" out there. I don' t mind investing in this dead company. I see so many yts tout the virtues of companies without explaining how they derive their prices. Overpaying comes with a cost, and i don' t think many people realize it. When i see praise of msft for example andof buying (although never financial advice) i don' t see them saying that msft would have to grow 30 percent a year for the next years (13 over the last 5 for context) and that for an 8 percent discount rate. Great company, just not a great price. ...Expand 2
@

@bretttingey56233 years ago Intcs 20 year under performance is a function of being over hyped during the tech bubble. I dont understand why that would be dillons reason to avoid id="hidden15" them now. My take away would be to avoid companies priced at sky high multiples. ...Expand 6
@

@jaanliitmae65993 years ago If your 2026 forecasts are not materialized even remotely, board will somehow start to look into spin-off`s and similar stuff (as heavy buy-backs did not . ...Expand 2
@

@warrenking79653 years ago Im long at around $53 cost. Im not buying more but ill pick up more via leveraged q as its 1. 33 percent of that. My original thesis is if geopoli id="hidden17"tical drama increases in asia then american manufacturing is going to be critical so i wanted at least some exposure to criticalmicron and tsmc are also building us foundries if i understand correctly. Historically this stock has seen several 30% crashes from peak to trough and it crashes with the market as well as other times. So overall at least the way the market treats this stock, i can still expect it to crash when the qs crash so i get as much downside risk but less upside? If hit 45 again maybe it would be worth buying because thats basically the floor but maybe better just to get the soxl and be better diversified. I also dont like the buybacks. The market likes confidence. Look at telsa building factories and they dont get punished because manufacturing is low margin. Maybe because manufacturing helps you protect trade secrets?. ...Expand 2
@

@miraclekhulgee14963 years ago Yo guys i went yolo calls intc 52 exp 12/03 with 100 contracts. I bet they will be gap fill 55 area. I am very fascinated by intc. Cause it seems like . ...Expand
@

@gabrielw77733 years ago I let the institutions tell me if intc earning were going to be good or not. They know ahead of time what the earnings will be. There is no way intc takes . ...Expand 1
@

@altairjb3 years ago A dead company with new products about to come out that seem to be pretty good. Generate profits every year and consistently, unlike some " great id="hidden21" out there. I don' t mind investing in this dead company. I see so many yts tout the virtues of companies without explaining how they derive their prices. Overpaying comes with a cost, and i don' t think many people realize it. When i see praise of msft for example andof buying (although never financial advice) i don' t see them saying that msft would have to grow 30 percent a year for the next years (13 over the last 5 for context) and that for an 8 percent discount rate. Great company, just not a great price. ...Expand 2
@

@bretttingey56233 years ago Intcs 20 year under performance is a function of being over hyped during the tech bubble. I dont understand why that would be dillons reason to avoid id="hidden22" them now. My take away would be to avoid companies priced at sky high multiples. ...Expand 6
@

@jaanliitmae65993 years ago If your 2026 forecasts are not materialized even remotely, board will somehow start to look into spin-off`s and similar stuff (as heavy buy-backs did not . ...Expand 2
@

@warrenking79653 years ago Im long at around $53 cost. Im not buying more but ill pick up more via leveraged q as its 1. 33 percent of that. My original thesis is if geopoli id="hidden24"tical drama increases in asia then american manufacturing is going to be critical so i wanted at least some exposure to criticalmicron and tsmc are also building us foundries if i understand correctly. Historically this stock has seen several 30% crashes from peak to trough and it crashes with the market as well as other times. So overall at least the way the market treats this stock, i can still expect it to crash when the qs crash so i get as much downside risk but less upside? If hit 45 again maybe it would be worth buying because thats basically the floor but maybe better just to get the soxl and be better diversified. I also dont like the buybacks. The market likes confidence. Look at telsa building factories and they dont get punished because manufacturing is low margin. Maybe because manufacturing helps you protect trade secrets?. ...Expand 2
@

@miraclekhulgee14963 years ago Yo guys i went yolo calls intc 52 exp 12/03 with 100 contracts. I bet they will be gap fill 55 area. I am very fascinated by intc. Cause it seems like . ...Expand
@

@gabrielw77733 years ago I let the institutions tell me if intc earning were going to be good or not. They know ahead of time what the earnings will be. There is no way intc takes . ...Expand 1
@

@altairjb3 years ago A dead company with new products about to come out that seem to be pretty good. Generate profits every year and consistently, unlike some " great id="hidden28" out there. I don' t mind investing in this dead company. I see so many yts tout the virtues of companies without explaining how they derive their prices. Overpaying comes with a cost, and i don' t think many people realize it. When i see praise of msft for example andof buying (although never financial advice) i don' t see them saying that msft would have to grow 30 percent a year for the next years (13 over the last 5 for context) and that for an 8 percent discount rate. Great company, just not a great price. ...Expand 2